Describe two conflicting accounts without judging credibility

A draft report that keeps each account attributed and lists unresolved disagreements, with an attribution matrix.

Choose one of two approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

Gemini Notebook: cited matrix and draft, you check

Gemini Notebook builds a cited attribution matrix and drafts the report. You check both against the originals and decide.

  1. You

    Collect and label sources

  2. Gemini Notebook

    Build attribution matrix

  3. You

    Check the matrix

  4. Gemini Notebook

    Draft the report

  5. You

    Compare and decide

  1. Collect and label the sources

    Use: You

    Collect the two accounts and any agreed factual record; write down your constraints and label each item with author and date where known.

    Check

    Check each item is the intended one and is labelled. Check your organisation's rules for confidential material before uploading; this record does not establish that this is permitted.

  2. Build the attribution matrix

    Use: Gemini Notebook

    Upload the labelled sources to a notebook and ask for an attribution matrix separating each account, with a citation for each item.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Align agreed facts, disputed claims and absent evidence. Produce: Attribution matrix separating each account. Use only the ticked sources and cite the source for each item. Write NOT STATED where the sources do not say. Do not add facts or judgments.

  3. Check the matrix against the sources

    Use: You

    Check the attribution matrix against the original sources and correct it.

    Check

    Check attribution and confirm the report is not an investigative finding.

  4. Draft the report

    Use: Gemini Notebook

    In the same notebook, ask for a first draft report preserving attribution and unresolved disagreements.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Draft report preserving attribution and unresolved disagreements. Use only the checked matrix and the sources in this notebook. Keep source attribution and keep missing facts marked NOT STATED. Add no new facts and no credibility judgement.

  5. Compare the draft and decide

    Use: You

    Compare the draft with the original inputs, keep open decisions listed, then accept or reject it.

    Check

    Check no disputed claim becomes a shared fact and no unsupported credibility judgement appears; edit the draft by hand where it differs. Preparation only: nothing is sent, published, signed, shared or changed in a live account.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Final check

Verify attribution and confirm the report is not an investigative finding.

No disputed claim becomes a shared fact and no unsupported credibility judgement appears. Compare the artefact with original inputs and retain unresolved decisions.

Missing facts and open decisions are listed, not filled in.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • Whether the source material may be uploaded or pasted into any of these tools is for the owner to confirm.
  • Plan and region availability of each tool is not checked on the cited pages.
  • Whether each AI step handles this material well is not yet checked; sample it on non-sensitive text first.

Share this page