Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.
Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →
Claude lists quotes and drafts from rows you classify. Gemini Notebook audits the material. You decide each mark.
Collect claim and evidence
List quotes in a table
Set each row's status
Draft material and questions
Audit against the worksheet
Decide marks and finish
Use: You
Collect the customer claim, charge evidence, dispute intake rules, and the service owner's approved rules, scope and as-of dates, keeping source IDs.
Check only the claim, charge evidence and intake rules are included, with no passwords, authentication codes, session tokens or payment credentials.
Use: Claude
Add the dispute bundle with charge-line and evidence IDs to a Claude chat; ask for a verbatim quote table with IDs and exact quotes.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Verbatim quote table of charge lines, customer objections and supplied evidence with IDs. Use only the supplied claim and charge evidence. List each charge line, each customer objection and each piece of supplied evidence as its own row with an ID and the exact quote. Add no judgments or status labels.
Use: You
Match each charge line to its objection and evidence by reading the originals. Mark any line whose evidence is missing.
Check line, amount, date and quoted objection against the claim and charge evidence. Keep every evidence gap visible.
Use: Claude
In the same chat, ask for the draft dispute material with contested lines, evidence gaps and requested remedy, plus a separate open-questions list.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft dispute packet with contested lines, evidence gaps and requested remedy; Open questions on entitlement and proposed next human decision. Write the packet for the billing dispute reviewer. Show every disputed line with its evidence and gaps, then the remedy the customer asks for. Do not decide entitlement and do not suggest a refund or chargeback. Put open questions in a separate list. Tag each sentence with its worksheet row so the later audit can check it.
Use: Gemini Notebook
Add the material, open questions and worksheet as sources in Gemini Notebook; ask it to mark each part the worksheet does not support.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft dispute packet with contested lines, evidence gaps and requested remedy with unsupported statements marked; Open questions on entitlement and proposed next human decision updated after the audit. Compare each part of the packet with the dispute worksheet. Mark any disputed line that is missing, any evidence gap that was hidden, and any wording that decides entitlement or promises a remedy. Update the open questions with what you marked.
Use: You
Read each marked part against the worksheet. Restore a dropped line, expose a gap or remove a judgement, then close the work as preparation only.
Check disputed lines and evidence gaps remain visible; no refund or chargeback is filed. Settle recipients and authority for later use separately; not approval to act.
You supply the claim, evidence and rules. ChatGPT builds the dispute worksheet and drafts the material. You check every row.
Collect claim and evidence
Build worksheet and material
Check and decide
Use: You
Collect the customer claim, charge evidence, dispute intake rules, and the service owner's approved rules, scope and as-of dates, keeping source IDs.
Check only the claim, charge evidence and intake rules are included, with no passwords, authentication codes, session tokens or payment credentials.
Use: ChatGPT
In one ChatGPT chat, add the dispute bundle with source IDs; ask for the dispute worksheet, then the draft material and open-questions list.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft dispute worksheet matching each charge line to the objection, evidence and gap. Use only the supplied claim, charge evidence and intake rules. Write one row per charge line with the line ID, the customer's objection as an exact quote, the supplied evidence with its ID, and the gap if the evidence is missing. Record the remedy the customer asks for in its own row. Do not judge who is right. Task: Draft dispute packet with contested lines, evidence gaps and requested remedy; Open questions on entitlement and proposed next human decision. Write the packet for the billing dispute reviewer. Show every disputed line with its evidence and gaps, then the remedy the customer asks for. Do not decide entitlement and do not suggest a refund or chargeback. Put open questions in a separate list. Tie each open question to a worksheet row.
Use: You
Check every worksheet row and the material against the originals, correct them in the same chat, and close the work as preparation only.
Check disputed lines and evidence gaps remain visible; no refund or chargeback is filed. Settle recipients and authority for later use separately; not approval to act. Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.
Gemini drafts the worksheet rows and the material. You check every row and line against the originals.
Collect claim and evidence
Draft the worksheet rows
Check rows against originals
Draft material and questions
Check material and decide
Use: You
Collect the customer claim, charge evidence, dispute intake rules, and the service owner's approved rules, scope and as-of dates, keeping source IDs.
Check only the claim, charge evidence and intake rules are included, with no passwords, authentication codes, session tokens or payment credentials.
Use: Gemini
Add the claim and charge evidence to a Gemini chat; ask for one worksheet row per charge line with objection, evidence and gap.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft a dispute worksheet. Write one row per charge line with the objection, the evidence behind it and any gap. Use only the material you are given. Keep source IDs and statuses unchanged. If you cannot support a row from the material, list it separately as a gap. Do not decide entitlement and do not suggest a refund or chargeback.
Use: You
Check each drafted row against the original claim and charge evidence and correct it: line, amount, date and quoted objection.
Keep every evidence gap visible and keep source IDs unchanged.
Use: Gemini
In the same chat, ask for the draft dispute material and a separate open-questions list, using only the checked rows.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft dispute packet with contested lines, evidence gaps and requested remedy; Open questions on entitlement and proposed next human decision. Write the packet for the billing dispute reviewer. Show every disputed line with its evidence and gaps, then the remedy the customer asks for. Do not decide entitlement and do not suggest a refund or chargeback. Put open questions in a separate list. Use only the rows you are given.
Use: You
Read the material and open questions against the originals, correct them in the same chat, and close the work as preparation only.
Check disputed lines and evidence gaps remain visible; no refund or chargeback is filed. Settle recipients and authority for later use separately; not approval to act. Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.
Best when: You want a second tool auditing the material
What it does: Claude lists and drafts; Gemini Notebook audits; you decide
Strong at: Citations let you check answers against the source quote
Limit: Material goes to two vendors, two data-handling terms
Free plan: Claude: Yes; Gemini Notebook: Yes
Best when: You want one assistant for the worksheet and the material
What it does: ChatGPT builds and drafts; you check every row
Strong at: Applies a framework from one document to another
Limit: A missed worksheet row can reach the material unchecked
Free plan: Yes
Best when: You want the first pass drafted, then checked by hand
What it does: Gemini drafts rows and material; you check everything
Strong at: Takes uploaded documents, spreadsheets and other files
Limit: Every drafted row still needs checking against originals
Free plan: Yes
Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.
Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.
Never paste credentials or full payment details.
All disputed lines and evidence gaps stay visible, and the draft decides no entitlement.
Every statement in the draft traces to a checked row with a source ID.
Gaps stay visible as gaps; none is filled by inference.
No credentials of any kind are copied.
The named reviewer confirms the evidence and the draft; completion is preparation only.
Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.