Show how long tickets have waited, separating paused time from real waiting time

A draft aging table showing each ticket's eligible time and wall-clock age.

Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

ChatGPT: computes the intervals and lays out the table

ChatGPT computes the intervals and lays out the aging table from your histories and clock rules. You check the numbers.

  1. You

    Have ready

  2. ChatGPT

    Compute and lay out

  3. You

    Check and approve

  1. Have ready: the ticket histories and clock rules

    Use: You

    Collect the ticket histories and the supplied service clock rules, scope and as-of dates.

    Check

    Never paste credentials or full payment details. Check each ticket ID still matches your records.

  2. Compute the intervals and lay out the table

    Use: ChatGPT

    Ask ChatGPT to compute status intervals, eligible time and wall-clock age, flag inconsistent rows and lay out the aging table.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Interval sheet and draft aging table showing eligible time and wall-clock age; explicit unresolved questions and proposed next human decision, not an executed action. Using only the pasted ticket histories and the clock rules I pasted, compute each ticket's status intervals, eligible-time totals and wall-clock ages from the rule text, list every row whose stated rule, eligible-time total or age looks inconsistent with the rule text, then lay out the aging table with the as-of time. If a status has no stated rule, mark the rule UNRESOLVED instead of choosing one. Use only the supplied case evidence and rules. Do not request or reproduce passwords, authentication codes, session tokens or payment credentials. Do not send, change records or accounts, assign work or commit any remedy or deadline. Mark every missing or contradictory fact as still to confirm instead of inferring it.

  3. Check the numbers and approve or hold

    Use: You

    Recompute a sample by hand, check every flagged row and unresolved rule, then approve or hold.

    Check

    Do not resolve missing or contradictory facts by inference. Nothing leaves this workflow without your approval. Every case has an as-of time and an applied or unresolved clock rule.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.

Final check

Queue manager checks the figures against the supplied originals: in option A after the compute-and-lay-out step, and in options B and C before the summary is written.

No customer secrets in any prompt or handoff; cut down customer data before upload.

Queue manager confirms the final draft; the draft is preparation only and no downstream action is taken.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • Whether ChatGPT or Julius may be used for the cross-check and rule-coverage steps listed here is not decided by the source pages; the service owner must confirm before use.
  • Option B prompts ask for arithmetic but do not rule out code execution; the service owner confirms a no-code mode before use.

Share this page