No primary is set. A puts fact table and drafting in one doc surface, B keeps limits human and delegates drafting only, and C adds cited extraction and a second reader around a hand-written sheet.
Option A: Coda: tables the facts, you settle limits, it drafts options
Best when: Facts fit a table and you want each row checked
What it does: Coda tables facts and drafts; you confirm and sign off
Strong at: AI chat, assistant and AI columns in docs
Limit: Prose authority limits may not fit rows; you catch that
Free plan: Yes, limited (1 GB attachments per doc)
Option B: Claude: drafts options from your leadership-approved sheet
Best when: Leadership settles limits before a tool drafts
What it does: Claude drafts from your confirmed sheet; you sign off
Strong at: Drafts and edits text in many formats
Limit: You carry the reading work before any help
Free plan: Yes, limited (5-hour and weekly usage caps)
Option C: Gemini Notebook cites facts, ChatGPT critiques your sheet
Best when: You want citations and an outside read
What it does: Gemini Notebook cites facts; ChatGPT critiques; you sign off
Strong at: Answers grounded in your sources with citations
Limit: A second vendor sees the pricing structure
Free plan: Gemini Notebook: Yes, limited (500,000-word sources); ChatGPT: Yes, limited (upload caps)