Prepare a one-page company summary

A one-page company brief with dated source links, open questions and confidence flags.

Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

Perplexity researches; Claude drafts the brief

You check sources, rules and decisions. Perplexity drafts only from the checked material.

  1. You

    Prepare the checked inputs

  2. Perplexity

    Research dated company facts

  3. You

    Check facts, build the table

  4. Claude

    Draft the one-page brief

  5. You

    Approve or hold

  1. Prepare the checked inputs

    Use: You

    Have ready: account name, known links and the internal reason for choosing the account.

  2. Research dated company facts

    Use: Perplexity

    Ask Perplexity for dated facts with inline citations.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Fact answers with inline source citations. Research 'Example Robotics Ltd'. List only public facts from sources I could share openly with the account (what they do, size signals, recent news) with the date each fact was published. Keep the inline citation for every fact.

  3. Check facts and build the dated table

    Use: You

    Check sampled facts against links. Record claim, source URL, access date and verdict.

  4. Draft the one-page brief

    Use: Claude

    Ask Claude to draft from the checked fact table and internal note, with dated links, open questions and confidence flags.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: One-page brief draft with dated source links, open questions and confidence flags. Using only the checked fact table below (do not invent facts), draft a one-page account brief. End with open questions public sources could not answer, and mark every statement that is an inference with a confidence flag. Checked fact table: [paste the checked fact table]. Context for emphasis, not for quoting: [internal note].

  5. Approve or hold

    Use: You

    Read the brief, check open questions, remove unsupported facts and approve.

    Check

    Check every statement is sourced from the checked table or marked unchecked, with no new facts. Read the brief end to end, check the open questions are relevant and remove anything the fact table does not support.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.

Final check

You verify a sample of facts against linked sources before drafting, whichever path is taken.

The account owner reads the final brief end to end and confirms the open questions.

No path sends anything to the account; the brief is preparation only.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • What each tool can do is judged only from official vendor pages quoted in evidence.
  • No vendor wording read for: how well uncertainty is flagged (options A, B and C), condensing a checked fact list into a brief (option C), access-date stamping by the research tools (all options).
  • Whether Perplexity's free tier also shows inline citations is not stated on the pages we checked (option A).

Share this page