Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.
Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →
Claude builds the deviation map and drafts the instruction in one chat, with your check after each stage. Not certification.
You: Prepare input pack
Claude: Build deviation map
You: Correct the map
Claude: Draft instruction, checklist
You: Check and decide
Use: You
Have ready: the known defect, approved workaround limits and expiry conditions. Mark anything not stated as still to confirm.
Check nothing outside the supplied inputs is added.
Use: Claude
Ask Claude to build the deviation map with expiry and reversion triggers: one row per deviation with source ID, dates and uncertainty.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Deviation map with expiry and reversion triggers retaining source IDs, relevant dates, explicit uncertainties and reviewer corrections. Using only the attached inputs, build the deviation map with expiry and reversion triggers. Keep every source ID and date, mark uncertain items as uncertain, and do not invent policy or numbers.
Use: You
Check the map row by row against the original inputs and correct it in place.
Compare identifiers, definitions, dates and ambiguous claims against the original inputs.
Use: Claude
Ask Claude to draft the workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist from the corrected map, listing unresolved questions.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist; Unresolved questions with source references. From the corrected output and the original inputs only, prepare the draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist. List unresolved questions with source references. Do not take or propose any action as done.
Use: You
Check the draft against the requirements; confirm any next action separately.
Check permitted scope, expiry and safety implications. Safety, legal or employment needs go to the responsible qualified person. Do not send, publish, update records, assign people, reserve resources, buy goods or authorise work.
You write the deviation map by hand with source IDs. Notion AI drafts only from that checked table. Not certification.
You: Write map by hand
Notion AI: Draft instruction
You: Check against table
Use: You
Write the deviation map as a table: one row per deviation with source ID, date, expiry condition, reversion trigger and explicit uncertainty.
Compare identifiers, definitions, dates and ambiguous claims against the original inputs.
Use: Notion AI
Ask Notion AI to draft the workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist from the checked table, listing unresolved questions.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist; Unresolved questions with source references. Use only the first-stage table in this Notion page and the inputs. Prepare the draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist. Keep source references and list unresolved questions; do not assert anything the output does not support.
Use: You
Compare the draft with the hand-built table line by line and fix any drift; confirm any next action separately.
Do not send, publish, update records, assign people, reserve resources, buy goods or authorise work.
ChatGPT builds the map; you check it; a fresh Gemini session drafts only from the checked map. Not certification.
You: Prepare input pack
ChatGPT: Build deviation map
You: Check, carry over
Gemini: Draft instruction, checklist
You: Check and decide
Use: You
Have ready: the known defect, approved workaround limits and expiry conditions. Mark anything not stated as still to confirm.
Check nothing outside the supplied inputs is added.
Use: ChatGPT
Ask ChatGPT to build the deviation map: one row per deviation with source ID, dates and uncertainty.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Deviation map with expiry and reversion triggers retaining source IDs, relevant dates, explicit uncertainties and reviewer corrections. Using only the attached inputs, build a deviation map with expiry and reversion triggers. One row per deviation with source ID, dates, uncertainty. Do not invent policy.
Use: You
Check the map against the originals and correct it before it leaves ChatGPT; save it as the only carry-over.
Compare identifiers, definitions, dates and ambiguous claims against the original inputs.
Use: Gemini
Paste the checked map and inputs into a fresh Gemini session; ask for the draft instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist.
What to paste into the tool
Task: Draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist; Unresolved questions with source references. Use only the pasted checked first-stage output and the supplied inputs. Prepare the draft workaround instruction with monitoring and reversion checklist. List unresolved questions with source references.
Use: You
Check the draft against the requirements; confirm any next action separately.
Do not send, publish, update records, assign people, reserve resources, buy goods or authorise work.
Best when: You want one tool for both stages with a check after each
What it does: Claude builds and drafts; you check twice
Strong at: One conversation carries inputs and map into the draft
Limit: A first-stage error can carry into the draft; check carefully
Free plan: Yes
Best when: You want to set the triggers personally, tool only drafts
What it does: You build the map; Notion AI drafts from it
Strong at: Every source ID and date is placed by you
Limit: Notion AI full features need Business; Free and Plus get a trial
Free plan: Paid plan needed
Best when: You want drafting from a checked map in a fresh session
What it does: ChatGPT maps, you check, Gemini drafts separately
Strong at: The draft starts only from the checked table, not raw chat
Limit: Two tools mean a manual copy between sessions
Free plan: ChatGPT: Yes, limited (uploads and analysis capped); Gemini: Yes
Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.
Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.
Named human compares every identifier, date, number and uncertain claim with the original inputs before the draft moves on.
Missing facts stay not stated; nothing is sent, published, assigned or authorised.
Cut down operational and personnel data pasted into any tool.
Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.