Plan which channels announce first while the news is under embargo

An embargo-safe channel sequence with review gates, release windows and an owner handoff schedule.

Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

Claude: builds the timeline and drafts the sequence

Claude builds the channel timeline and drafts the embargo-safe sequence. You gate both stages and decide.

  1. You

    Collect embargo evidence

  2. Claude

    Build channel timeline

  3. You

    Check the timeline

  4. Claude

    Draft the sequence

  5. You

    Completion check, decide

  1. Collect and clear the embargo evidence

    Use: You

    Have ready: the confirmed embargo time and zone, the approved release materials, the channel lead times and the campaign constraints.

    Check

    The embargo time and zone come from the authoritative source, and every input carries a source ID and date.

  2. Build the channel timeline

    Use: Claude

    Upload the cleared inputs and ask Claude for the channel dependency timeline with review gates and permitted release windows, then an Excel file.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Channel dependency timeline with review gates and permitted release windows; Source references; Uncertain or absent facts. Using only the supplied evidence set, build a channel dependency timeline: for each channel, the preparation steps, the review gates, the permitted release window relative to the confirmed embargo time and zone, and the lead time from the supplied evidence. Keep the source ID and date on every row. Flag any timezone conflict as unresolved; do not resolve it by guessing. List missing facts. Do not add facts beyond the uploads. Then create an Excel file containing the timeline.

  3. Check the timeline against the inputs

    Use: You

    Compare the working record with the original inputs; resolve or keep missing facts before sequencing.

    Check

    Permitted use is recorded before drafting.

  4. Draft the channel sequence

    Use: Claude

    In the same chat, order channel preparation and release handoffs around the confirmed embargo and unresolved timezone conflicts; create a Word document.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Draft embargo-safe channel sequence and owner handoff schedule; Open questions and approval dependencies retained beside the recommendations. Using only the reviewer-checked timeline, draft a channel sequence and owner handoff schedule: order the channel preparation and release handoffs so no public step precedes the confirmed embargo, name the owner for each handoff, and keep the source ID and date beside each scheduled step. Where a timezone conflict is unresolved, mark the affected steps as blocked rather than scheduling them. List open questions and approval dependencies beside the recommendations. Then create a Word document containing the sequence and schedule.

  5. Run the completion check and decide

    Use: You

    Check no planned public step precedes the confirmed embargo and every unresolved timezone conflict is marked as blocking the final schedule; decide corrections.

    Check

    Approval and any execution are separate decisions.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.

Final check

The Launch communications lead compares the working record with the original inputs and confirms permitted use before drafting.

The Launch communications lead applies the check: No planned public step precedes the confirmed embargo and unresolved timezone conflicts block final scheduling. Human confirmation by Launch communications lead: evidence and unresolved questions reviewed.

No option sends, publishes, deploys or changes any account; approval and any execution are separate human decisions.

Instructions hidden in external files or websites can trick Claude; check files before you use them.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • Timezone reconciliation is a human responsibility in every path; no vendor evidence supports delegating it.
  • The unresolved questions reach the draft through the explicit handoff from the checked record, and the constraints come from the owner-supplied constraints named in the starting input.
  • Vendor pages checked 2026-10-28. Check plan terms and limits with the vendor, and check each tool on your own data.
  • The options were chosen from the 154-tool catalogue by documented upload, extraction and drafting operations; purpose-built catalogue tools such as a source-grounded notebook or an SEO content tool were not compared against these options.

Share this page