Write a brief for a campaign to keep at-risk customers, based on why others left

A retention campaign brief for active at-risk customers, with eligible treatments and stop conditions.

Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

Gemini: builds the cohort table and drafts the brief

Gemini builds the cohort table from uploaded aggregate evidence and drafts the brief. You gate both stages and decide.

  1. You

    Collect aggregate evidence

  2. Gemini

    Build cohort table

  3. You

    Check the table

  4. Gemini

    Draft retention brief

  5. You

    Completion check, decide

  1. Collect and clear the aggregate evidence

    Use: You

    Collect the supplied aggregate evidence; confirm consent and suppression rules are attached.

    Check

    Use supplied aggregate reasons and owner-defined eligibility only; do not infer individual churn or motive.

  2. Build the active-at-risk cohort table

    Use: Gemini

    Upload the cleared inputs and ask Gemini for the cohort table: current status, addressable churn driver, allowed treatment, ineligible states, stop conditions.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Active-at-risk cohort table with current status, addressable churn driver, allowed retention treatment, ineligible states and stop conditions; Source references; Uncertain or absent facts. Using only the supplied evidence set, build an active-at-risk cohort table: for each cohort, the current status, the addressable churn driver from the supplied aggregate reasons, the allowed retention treatment from the approved offers, ineligible states, and stop conditions. Keep the source ID and date on every row. Mark lapsed or former customers as out of scope for this brief. List missing or uncertain facts. Do not add facts beyond the uploads and do not infer individual motives.

  3. Check the table against the inputs

    Use: You

    Compare the working record with the original inputs; resolve or keep missing facts before drafting.

    Check

    Permitted use is recorded on every row before drafting.

  4. Draft the retention brief

    Use: Gemini

    In the same chat, match checked churn drivers to interventions for currently active at-risk customers, applying eligibility and stop rules.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Draft retention campaign brief for currently active at-risk customers with eligible treatments and stop conditions; Open questions and approval dependencies retained beside the recommendations. Using only the reviewer-checked cohort table, draft a retention campaign brief for currently active at-risk customers: for each cohort, the eligible treatments from the approved offers and the stop conditions. Keep the source ID and date beside each intervention. State the suppression and stop rules explicitly. List open questions and approval dependencies beside the recommendations. Exclude lapsed or former customers; note them for a separate win-back brief. Do not add facts and do not infer individual motives.

  5. Run the completion check and decide

    Use: You

    Every intervention must map to an evidenced driver and a currently active at-risk cohort; lapsed customers go to a win-back brief.

    Check

    Suppression and stop rules must be explicit. Approval and execution are separate decisions.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.

Final check

The Lifecycle marketing lead and privacy reviewer compare the working record with the original inputs and confirm permitted use before drafting.

The Lifecycle marketing lead and privacy reviewer apply the check: Every intervention maps to an evidenced churn driver and a currently active at-risk cohort; lapsed or former customers are excluded or routed to a separate win-back brief, and suppression and stop rules are explicit. Human confirmation by Lifecycle marketing lead and privacy reviewer: evidence and unresolved questions reviewed.

No option sends, publishes, deploys or changes any account; approval and any execution are separate human decisions.

Instructions hidden in external files or websites can trick Claude; check files before you use them.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • Whether aggregate churn evidence is detailed enough to support per-cohort treatments is a data question no tool answer settles; facts still to confirm stay flagged for the reviewers.
  • The unresolved questions reach the draft through the explicit handoff from the checked record, and the constraints come from the owner-supplied constraints named in the starting input.
  • Vendor pages checked 2026-10-28. Check plan terms and limits with the vendor, and check each tool on your own data.
  • The options were chosen from the 154-tool catalogue by documented upload, extraction and drafting operations; purpose-built catalogue tools such as a source-grounded notebook or an SEO content tool were not compared against these options.

Share this page