Prepare evidence-linked feedback on a learner essay

Evidence-linked feedback on a learner essay with one or two specific revision actions.

Choose one of three approaches. The steps for that option appear below.

Choose an option above. On a phone, swipe the tabs left or right to see all options →

Claude: links passages to gaps, then drafts comments

Claude links essay passages to scoring checklist gaps, then drafts prioritised comments in the same chat. You check both.

  1. You

    Get ready

  2. Claude

    Link passages to gaps

  3. You

    Check the map

  4. Claude

    Draft the comments

  5. You

    Check and finish

  1. Have ready: essay, checklist, observations

    Use: You

    The learner essay, the scoring checklist and your approved observations of unsupported claims. Upload them to one Claude chat.

    Check

    Only material the data policy permits is uploaded; the learner's identity is removed first. Check sizes before upload: 500MB per file, 20 files per chat, 1000 PDF pages.

  2. Link essay passages to checklist gaps

    Use: Claude

    Ask Claude to link essay passages to scoring checklist gaps and existing strengths.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Draft evidence-to-criterion feedback map linking passages to scoring checklist gaps and strengths. Link passages of this essay to the scoring checklist: for each entry quote the passage, name the criterion it bears on, state the observed gap or existing strength, and connect it to any supplied teacher-approved observation. Keep unresolved items visible. Do not rewrite assessed work for submission or replace teacher judgement.

  3. Check observations and quotes against the essay

    Use: You

    Check every observation and quoted passage against the original essay. Correct the map and keep unresolved items.

    Check

    Check each quote exists in the original essay.

  4. Draft prioritised comments and revision prompts

    Use: Claude

    Paste the corrected map and ask for prioritised comments and one or two revision prompts.

    Details

    What to paste into the tool

    Task: Draft prioritized comments and revision prompts, not yet checked against the essay. Using only this corrected map, draft one or two prioritized comments and revision prompts per chosen gap. Each comment must cite the passage it responds to, align with the scoring checklist criterion, and guide a learner action. Do not rewrite assessed work for submission or replace teacher judgement.

  5. Check accuracy, tone and authorship

    Use: You

    Check the comments before the feedback is used.

    Check

    Check accuracy, tone and that the feedback keeps the learner's authorship. Check every item matches the approved sources. Preparation only; do not submit learner work, publish material, alter official grades or make placement decisions automatically. Passage mapping and feedback drafting depend on the teacher's checks.

Before you paste into any AI tool, remove any confidential information. Put it back at the end.

Tools in this workflow

Deciding between ChatGPT and Claude for this? See the comparison.

Final check

Teacher verifies every observation and quoted passage against the original essay before comments are drafted.

Teacher checks accuracy, tone and preservation of learner authorship before the feedback is used.

Comments must cite work, align with criteria and guide a learner action without supplying a replacement submission. Preparation only. You review the result; do not submit learner work, publish material, alter official grades or make placement decisions automatically.

Google may review the full context of what you share with it, including queries, uploads and the model's responses.

Check the result against your original inputs. Approve it before sharing or acting.

What still needs checking
  • No cited evidence confirms learner-work annotation, scoring checklist gap mapping or feedback drafting as operations; every option leaves those to the teacher's checks.

Share this page